Asrock J4105M

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock J4105M (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180504
Uptime	7.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '21 at 19:42
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4105 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Memory 48.1 1-Core 52.4 2-Core 105 40% 68.4 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 205 28% 206 Pts	64-Core 205 13% 205 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.26% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 2.6 2% 2.6 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 4.3 3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.26% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M500 120GB-$75 15,430 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 120 119 122 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	58% Above average	Read 374 Write 135 Mixed 192 SusWrite 119 45% 205 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 44.8 4K Mixed 25.6 88% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 154 125% 180 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 77%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 931GB free Firmware: MS2OA810 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 154 154 153 154 154 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	98.1% Outstanding	Read 189 Write 149 Mixed 36.6 SusWrite 153 95% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 118% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 107%
WD My Book 25EE 6TB 6,646 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 89 89 92 89 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 117 Write 120 Mixed 79.3 SusWrite 90.1 136% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
SK_Hynix HMA81GU6MFR8N-UH 2x8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	MC Read 12 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 13 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 4 11% 3.9 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	50	34.1"	1280 720	DELA0F9 Dell AW3418DW

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical J4105M Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J4105M

CPU
Celeron J4105IntelBench 36%, 1,216 samples	22x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	14x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	2x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x

SSD
SSD 240GBGigabyte $33Bench 73%, 20,238 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
M500 120GBCrucial $75Bench 66%, 15,430 samples	2x

RAM
HMA81GU6MFR8N-UH 2x8GBSK_HynixBench 29%, 7 samples	3x
HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 2x4GBSK_HynixBench 28%, 2 samples	2x
PSD44G240081 1x4GBPatriotBench 41%, 314 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $33

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16