Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 99% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191108
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '21 at 20:49
Run Duration	354 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Memory 66.6 1-Core 143 2-Core 285 87% 165 Pts	4-Core 542 8-Core 914 88% 728 Pts	64-Core 1,402 87% 1,402 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 94%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	114% Outstanding	Lighting 160 Reflection 181 Parallax 169 130% 170 fps	MRender 48.2 Gravity 166 Splatting 120 93% 111 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 133%
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% MSI(1462 3177) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	59.5% Above average	Lighting 74.1 Reflection 85.4 Parallax 74.7 60% 78.1 fps	MRender 75.8 Gravity 71.2 Splatting 66.9 58% 71.3 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB 26,055 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT22B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 141 140 136 132 129 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Read 490 Write 131 Mixed 200 SusWrite 140 53% 240 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 74.3 4K Mixed 34.2 131% 46.6 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 156 125% 177 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 126%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 299GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 419 435 423 439 435 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 440 Mixed 426 SusWrite 412 99% 439 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 73.3 4K Mixed 53.1 170% 55.9 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 198 150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 133%
PNY CS900 1TB SSD 7,281 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 152GB free Firmware: CS900P13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 395 207 151 189 151 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Read 468 Write 389 Mixed 331 SusWrite 232 79% 355 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 75.2 4K Mixed 37.1 139% 48.9 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 163 125% 168 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 102%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 259GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1361 1047 1098 1062 1027 978 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	248% Outstanding	Read 2,314 Write 2,204 Mixed 1,630 SusWrite 1,095 406% 1,811 MB/s	4K Read 57.5 4K Write 74.6 4K Mixed 63.1 208% 65.1 MB/s	DQ Read 780 DQ Write 315 DQ Mixed 462 365% 519 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 248% Great: 372%
Seagate ST500LM000-SSHD-8GB 500GB 13,141 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 49GB free Firmware: LVD3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 70 70 69 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Read 41.8 Write 75.7 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 70.1 39% 53.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.5 305% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 89,024 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.1% Good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 26 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 23.1 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 63: 6R 8G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
63%	59%	39	331	263	144	31.5"	2560 1440	AUS32B1 ASUS XG32V

History: Score 37: 4R 2G 11B | Score 63: 6R 8G 9B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,643x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,263x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,411x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,235x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,073x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,467x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,835x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	866x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $932

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16