bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH67BL
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '21 at 23:49
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$20
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Memory 47.9
1-Core 30.3
2-Core 53.1
29% 43.8 Pts
4-Core 91.1
8-Core 88.9
12% 90 Pts
64-Core 104
7% 104 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 2765) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.7% Poor
Lighting 31.8
Reflection 32.2
Parallax 39.7
26% 34.6 fps
MRender 42.8
Gravity 36.3
Splatting 33.6
30% 37.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 30%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB-$120
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 164 163 160 148 153 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.4% Above average
Read 204
Write 188
Mixed 176
SusWrite 164
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 23.1
81% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 153
117% 160 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 107%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
27GB free
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 155 120 109 121 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 429
Write 192
Mixed 206
SusWrite 128
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 33.6
4K Mixed 13.1
63% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 29.9
49% 94.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.6% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 13.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 5.8
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 55: 9R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
55% 17% 87 242 159 60 23" 1920 1080 HWP304B HP 23bw
History: Score 64: 8R 5G 9B | Score 55: 9R 2G 4B
Typical bin Builds (Compare 41,080 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $326
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback