Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Gaming FX705DD_FX705DD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX705DD_FX705DD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX705DD
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210311
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 07 '21 at 18:56
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 181
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 532
52% 424 Pts
64-Core 533
33% 533 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Asus(1043 10BF) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Lighting 34.8
Reflection 38.5
Parallax 38.4
28% 37.2 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 26.2
25% 30.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 28%
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Lighting 13.9
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 18.3
11% 14.4 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 13.2
10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SC152S37256 256GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0301
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 281 284 267 264 271 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.2% Good
Read 369
Write 284
Mixed 238
SusWrite 273
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 23.7
80% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 71.1
70% 111 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 14.4
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 4R 4G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 7% 206 103 4 60 21.5" 1920 1080 BNQ78DB BenQ GW2270
History: Score 46: 4R 6G 8B | Score 38: 4R 4G 6B
Typical TUF Gaming FX705DD_FX705DD Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705DD_FX705DD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $67
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback