Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '21 at 00:44
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 64.7
1-Core 147
2-Core 283
87% 165 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 862
81% 671 Pts
64-Core 1,345
83% 1,345 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.11
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.7% Above average
Lighting 77.8
Reflection 122
Parallax 80.2
63% 93.4 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 114
Splatting 0.3
53% 73.4 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 42 25 26 28 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 337
Write 59.1
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 30.7
26% 120 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 0.1
55% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 73.8
DQ Mixed 0.1
25% 62.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 78%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
63GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 394 218 211 206 199 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 431
Mixed 426
SusWrite 267
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 48.1
159% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 200
151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$114
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
59.6% Above average
MC Read 23
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 24.3
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 20.7
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 57: 5R 7G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
57% 13% 180 108 7 144 23.6" 1920 1080 PNS0243 Pixio PXC243
History: Score 26: 2R 3G 7B | Score 57: 5R 7G 11B
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,774 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback