PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Biostar TZ77XE3 (all builds) |
Memory | 7.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20120823 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 11 '21 at 07:53 |
Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
82.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11
|
26.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SSD 128GB 128GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0827A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 14 56 41 15 16 MB/s
|
34.5%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
|
67.4%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 25x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 14x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 11x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 12x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 11x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 112% - Outstanding | Total price: $268 |