Asus SABERTOOTH X99

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	87.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	84.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X99 (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160504
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 14 '21 at 04:16
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	43.2% Average	Memory 61.3 1-Core 35.2 2-Core 73 37% 56.5 Pts	4-Core 137 8-Core 214 22% 176 Pts	64-Core 263 16% 263 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6183) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	87.7% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 134 Parallax 123 84% 120 fps	MRender 111 Gravity 126 Splatting 112 95% 116 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 786GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 391 408 409 399 404 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Read 423 Write 433 Mixed 368 SusWrite 399 92% 406 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 31.1 108% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 233 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 217 162% 216 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 350GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 393 409 410 405 405 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Read 438 Write 435 Mixed 372 SusWrite 402 93% 412 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 47.5 4K Mixed 35.7 115% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 228 176% 240 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x16GB 15,722 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 10.7 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 10.2 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 68: 10R 6G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
68%	40%	40	273	193	75	31.5"	2560 1440	ACR0687 Acer ET322QU

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X99 Builds (Compare 955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X99

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	353x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	157x
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	127x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	107x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	86x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	73x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	39x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	33x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	30x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 120%, 113 samples	24x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $625

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16