Lenovo 82C7

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Lenovo 82C7 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory	0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201013
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 15 '21 at 05:37
Run Duration	224 Seconds
Run User	UZB-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U 78,189 User benchmarks, average bench 48% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Memory 33.9 1-Core 69.7 2-Core 115 40% 72.8 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 391 37% 307 Pts	64-Core 392 24% 392 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Legend(17AA 3805) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.9.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.2% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 3.6 2% 3 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 3.7 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 2.2% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$33 2,425 User benchmarks, average bench 139% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0614B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 74 74 89 76 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Read 576 Write 111 Mixed 369 SusWrite 79.9 62% 284 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 79 4K Mixed 25.6 117% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 397 DQ Write 401 DQ Mixed 259 233% 352 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 179%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free Firmware: LFM3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 127 124 126 124 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 117 Write 130 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 126 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB 48,985 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	MC Read 14 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 8.8 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 0.5 14% 4.77 GB/s	Latency 233 17% 233 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 34: 5R 1G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
34%	34%	35	140	101	60	15.5"	1366 768	CMN15E6

History: Score 17: 2R 1G 4B | Score 34: 5R 1G 6B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 82C7 Builds (Compare 656 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82C7

CPU
Ryzen 3 3250U GraphicsAMDBench 38%, 10,258 samples	219x
Ryzen 5 3500UAMDBench 48%, 78,189 samples	190x
3020e GraphicsAMDBench 33%, 2,539 samples	113x

GPU
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 17,211 samples	421x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	190x
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 27,821 samples	44x

SSD
SKHynix_HFM256GDHTNI-87A0B 256GBBench 143%, 4,825 samples	70x
MZALQ256HAJD-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 9,692 samples	63x
PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-256G-1101 256GBWDCBench 129%, 5,242 samples	51x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CWE M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBSamsungBench 65%, 2,729 samples	53x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	47x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E! 1x4GBMicronBench 38%, 1,169 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16