Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '21 at 16:27
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 238
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 639
65% 524 Pts
64-Core 817
51% 817 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2001) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.23% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 65.4
Parallax 6.2
5% 25.7 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9
6% 7.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.23%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E128 128GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C270902
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 171 142 141 135 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 347
Write 384
Mixed 372
SusWrite 153
71% 314 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 45.3
151% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 114
133% 228 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 93%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
488GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 81 83 79 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 47.4
Write 95.2
Mixed 72
SusWrite 79.4
55% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.7
171% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 17.1
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 18.6
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 62: 8R 4G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
62% 65% 34 298 214 60 0" 1920 1080 BOE0747
Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback