PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H67 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130912 |
Uptime | 1.2 Days |
Run Date | Jul 15 '21 at 20:11 |
Run Duration | 223 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3330
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
71.5%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 480GB-$37
258GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 180 199 197 202 201 MB/s
|
31%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
98GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 101 103 102 103 105 MB/s
|
86%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
33GB free
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 43 43 43 43 MB/s
|
43.3%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
31GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 101 103 102 103 105 MB/s
|
54.5%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
130GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 43 43 43 43 MB/s
|
29.1%
Poor
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
0GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28.6%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 7 | 60 | 26" | 1280 701 | CVT0003 CVTE TV |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 164x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 114x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 100x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 67x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 52x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 40x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $434 |