PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 67.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 14 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210323 |
Uptime | 2.6 Days |
Run Date | Jul 15 '21 at 23:11 |
Run Duration | 178 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 28% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
90.8%
Outstanding
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
67.1%
Good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 72 76 78 80 78 MB/s
|
91.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
656GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 406 371 398 380 387 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 257GB
81GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 8.4 7.9 8.1 6.7 8.1 MB/s
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$80
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6% | 40% | 10 | 97 | 2 | 60 | 22" | 1920 1080 | SPT08D5 E22 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 345x |
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples | 125x |
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 67x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 73x |
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples | 57x |
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 54x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Good | Total price: $844 |