Asrock X99M Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock X99M Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160816
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 16 '21 at 08:38
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 192
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 540
57% 447 Pts
64-Core 536
36% 536 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
31.7% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 42.1
Parallax 37.7
32% 39.8 fps
MRender 51.2
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 39.9
32% 42.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 32%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$195
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 96 93 94 93 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 427
Write 119
Mixed 195
SusWrite 94.8
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 34.8
124% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 252
195% 271 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 122%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 198 198 199 196 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 206
Write 155
Mixed 82
SusWrite 197
116% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 115%
Great: 115%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
5GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 9.2 9.1 8.5 7.4 8.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.52% Terrible
Read 22.5
Write 7
Mixed 6
SusWrite 8.4
12% 11 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
59% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.52%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB-$72
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.4% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 22
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 3 1 60 23" 1280 720 IVM5621 PLX2380H
Typical X99M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $662
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $394Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback