Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '21 at 15:33
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$165
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 110
2-Core 220
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 396
54% 396 Pts
64-Core 567
38% 567 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$749
Asus(1043 04E6) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56% Above average
Lighting 67.6
Reflection 66.5
Parallax 98.4
55% 77.5 fps
MRender 53.4
Gravity 75.1
Splatting 43.8
58% 57.4 fps
Poor: 54%
This bench: 56%
Great: 60%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$38
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 81 23 21 25 5.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 424
Write 362
Mixed 285
SusWrite 54.2
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 8.1
53% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 84.2
DQ Mixed 32.2
42% 75.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
189GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 117 115 113 119 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 135
Write 151
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 118
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
202% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
PNY 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 17.3
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 14
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 240 24.5" 1280 720 AOC2510 AG251F1WG2
Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,826 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $430
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback