Asus TUF Gaming FX505GD_FX505GD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GD_FX505GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GD
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '21 at 04:01
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 169
73% 120 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 397
43% 333 Pts
64-Core 399
27% 399 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 13B1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7111
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.2% Poor
Lighting 29.1
Reflection 25.5
Parallax 29.5
24% 28 fps
MRender 33.6
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 18.8
25% 27.6 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 27%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$55
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 531 384 384 376 376 327 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,257
Write 1,752
Mixed 1,045
SusWrite 396
250% 1,112 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 74
4K Mixed 54.3
167% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 739
DQ Write 477
DQ Mixed 603
451% 607 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 154%
Great: 284%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 129 124 124 124 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 122
Write 77.2
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 123
63% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown D4S8GS26A8 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.6% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 22.3
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 19.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 47: 6R 3G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
47% 24% 70 96 1 60 15.5" 1920 1080 LGD0563
Typical TUF Gaming FX505GD_FX505GD Builds (Compare 1,258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GD_FX505GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $61
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $394Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback