Asus Z170-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics89.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z170-P  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 10:11
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 146
2-Core 237
91% 159 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 706
73% 588 Pts
64-Core 774
48% 774 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
MSI(1462 3363) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.2% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 168
Parallax 100
87% 125 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 121
Splatting 112
94% 114 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 506ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 140 133 124 119 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 405
Write 152
Mixed 194
SusWrite 129
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 24
93% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 65.1
DQ Mixed 83
70% 106 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 94%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
70GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 415 243 249 249 244 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 406
Write 477
Mixed 373
SusWrite 289
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 41
152% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 325
246% 329 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 99%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
585GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 334 145 159 160 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 488
Mixed 391
SusWrite 216
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 52.4
185% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 107%
Great: 122%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
30GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 74 58 58 59 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 492
Write 359
Mixed 327
SusWrite 81.2
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 25
105% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 111
106% 173 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 82%
Lacie P9230 3TB
947GB free
Firmware: 1053
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 121 121 121 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 93.6
Write 101
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 122
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.6
201% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2Z3600C18 CMK16GX4M2C3000C16 CMK16GX4M2Z3600C18 CMK16GX4M2C3000C16 32GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
93.6% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 29
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 38.3
SC Mixed 29
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 6 165 34.1" 1280 720 SAM711A LC34G55T
Typical Z170-P Builds (Compare 4,184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-P - $119

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $531
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback