HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics214% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8437
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 20:40
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$312
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 92.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 246
87% 152 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 723
73% 579 Pts
64-Core 739
50% 739 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
Asus(1043 87B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
214% Outstanding
Lighting 279
Reflection 250
Parallax 284
225% 271 fps
MRender 320
Gravity 236
Splatting 173
200% 243 fps
Poor: 133%
This bench: 214%
Great: 226%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
673GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1869 1858 1895 1881 1057 353 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 1,461
Write 1897
Mixed 1,532
SusWrite 1,485
361% 1,594 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 77.4
256% 88.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,026
DQ Write 742
DQ Mixed 873
655% 880 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 268%
Great: 357%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
75GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 79 78 77 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 390
Write 80.5
Mixed 114
SusWrite 78.5
36% 166 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 23.5
97% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 79.6
DQ Mixed 110
88% 128 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56%
Great: 131%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$42
20GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 97 92 106 109 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 117
Write 106
Mixed 26
SusWrite 101
63% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$40
354GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 73 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 77.3
Write 74.5
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 72.5
52% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$81
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 24.4
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 25
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 27" 1280 720 LEN61AF LEN P27h-10
Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 3,800 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $762
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback