Asus PRIME H310M-A R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 65% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	88.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	6.72% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-A R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200331
Uptime	41.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '21 at 21:43
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700-$260 79,875 User benchmarks, average bench 92% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Memory 78.6 1-Core 139 2-Core 217 82% 145 Pts	4-Core 479 8-Core 754 76% 616 Pts	64-Core 807 50% 807 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% EVGA(3842 2068) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.6% Excellent	Lighting 110 Reflection 128 Parallax 79.7 90% 106 fps	MRender 129 Gravity 99.8 Splatting 95.1 87% 108 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 139GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKK1B3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 20 21 25 13 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	6.72% Terrible	Read 63.8 Write 16.5 Mixed 24.1 SusWrite 19 7% 30.9 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 2.2 10% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 6.72% Great: 102%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 447GB free Firmware: SBFKJ4.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 425 424 422 357 361 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Read 393 Write 389 Mixed 364 SusWrite 402 87% 387 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 77.2 4K Mixed 37.7 131% 47.5 MB/s	DQ Read 255 DQ Write 327 DQ Mixed 211 182% 265 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5702-088.A00G 1x8GB 139 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 10.4 34% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 8.4 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 83.2 48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	144	27"	1280 720	MSI3CA9 MSI G27C5

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-A R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-A R2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	595x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	230x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	191x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	241x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	175x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	150x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	127x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	82x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	46x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	54x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	49x
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $359

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16