Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 55% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	66.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Cyberpowerpc C SERIES (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI B360M Xtreme
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190508
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '21 at 04:21
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Memory 90.5 1-Core 126 2-Core 222 84% 146 Pts	4-Core 483 8-Core 728 75% 605 Pts	64-Core 734 45% 734 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% MSI(1462 3792) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	66.9% Good	Lighting 88.3 Reflection 82.3 Parallax 67.3 72% 79.3 fps	MRender 61.8 Gravity 77.1 Splatting 69.8 57% 69.6 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 71 52 48 31 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 374 Write 322 Mixed 290 SusWrite 64.2 59% 263 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 15.9 4K Mixed 8.3 33% 11.2 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 99.9 DQ Mixed 17.8 38% 76.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 202GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 112 110 112 115 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 124 Write 113 Mixed 78.2 SusWrite 112 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.1 205% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GB 14,178 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	MC Read 31.6 MC Write 30.9 MC Mixed 23.6 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 22.6 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 66.6 60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 52: 10R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
52%	43%	28	108	5	60	27"	1920 1080	HWP3326 HP 27er

History: Score 50: 5R 6G 7B | Score 52: 10R 0G 2B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 62%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 52%

Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	2,319x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	680x
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	354x

GPU
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	1,302x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	534x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	326x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	991x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	206x
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	185x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 14,178 samples	235x
DDR4 3000 1x8GBUnknownBench 40%, 4,421 samples	177x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	177x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $280

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16