Viglen VIG800S

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Viglen VIG800S (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Q87M-E
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150714
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '21 at 18:37
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	ARE-User
Background CPU	84%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	65.8% Good	Memory 69.6 1-Core 86.3 2-Core 181 63% 112 Pts	4-Core 361 8-Core 345 48% 353 Pts	64-Core 303 19% 303 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.3% Average	Lighting 58.5 Reflection 69.8 Parallax 62 48% 63.4 fps	MRender 69.3 Gravity 60.9 Splatting 54.6 50% 61.6 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB 12,615 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: H190117D SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 336 339 280 305 259 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 314 Write 257 Mixed 262 SusWrite 293 63% 282 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 29.7 100% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 27.8 DQ Write 66.5 DQ Mixed 34.1 30% 42.8 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 240%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 16GB 5,753 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 7GB free, PID 557d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 12 10 11 11 9.9 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 27.6 Write 16 Mixed 22.6 SusWrite 11.3 25% 19.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.6 164% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905458-010.A00LF Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 1310 9DSSBMZB-TATP 9905458-010.A00LF 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.2% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 15.1 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 15.4 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	5	60	20"	1280 720	HWP2943 HP LA2006

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VIG800S Builds (Compare 610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Viglen VIG800S

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	158x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	113x
Core i5-4690Intel $52Bench 67%, 73,695 samples	75x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	104x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	40x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	31x

SSD
MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 73%, 5,673 samples	60x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
M378B1G73QH0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 6,401 samples	9x
CT102464BA160B.M16 2x8GBCrucialBench 54%, 2,915 samples	8x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $150

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16