Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 28 '21 at 09:58
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$320
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 64.9
1-Core 119
2-Core 222
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 652
64% 513 Pts
64-Core 798
54% 798 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$770
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3994 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Lighting 187
Reflection 180
Parallax 186
152% 184 fps
MRender 208
Gravity 165
Splatting 135
138% 169 fps
Poor: 118%
This bench: 145%
Great: 148%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 1TB-$100
638GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 390 409 388 405 408 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 448
Write 414
Mixed 380
SusWrite 399
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 31.9
127% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 192
146% 198 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90%
Great: 120%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
804GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 165 162 164 165 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 92.1
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 165
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$80
433GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 89 84 91 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 57.7
Write 75.6
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 88.3
46% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$80
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.8% Good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 25.1
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 15.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 1: 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 6% 16 5 3 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ7F09 BenQ XL2420TX
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 24,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,124
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback