Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 163%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics182% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '21 at 13:42
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 91.3
1-Core 135
2-Core 270
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 840
81% 666 Pts
64-Core 1,021
63% 1,021 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
182% Outstanding
Lighting 266
Reflection 238
Parallax 285
217% 263 fps
MRender 301
Gravity 212
Splatting 156
175% 223 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 182%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 237 118 89 90 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 193
Mixed 343
SusWrite 176
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 55.1
183% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 348
265% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 102%
Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
356GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 32 35 47 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 55.7
Write 51.3
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 53.7
34% 46.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 24.7
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 25.7
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 5 144 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 Q27G2WG4
Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF Builds (Compare 888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $684
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback