Asus PRIME Z270M-PLUS/BR

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	9.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME Z270M-PLUS/BR (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190703
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 30 '21 at 03:02
Run Duration	301 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Memory 95 1-Core 140 2-Core 305 98% 180 Pts	4-Core 538 8-Core 775 82% 656 Pts	64-Core 768 48% 768 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 645 4,869 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Nvidia(10DE 1029) 1GB CLim: 823 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	9.48% Terrible	Lighting 10.8 Reflection 12.9 Parallax 14.1 9% 12.6 fps	MRender 14.9 Gravity 13.9 Splatting 11.5 11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.48% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,588 Write 1,791 Mixed 1,584 440% 1,988 MB/s	4K Read 67.8 4K Write 162 4K Mixed 91.3 306% 107 MB/s	DQ Read 1,009 DQ Write 843 DQ Mixed 935 698% 929 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB 13,215 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 200GB free Firmware: EXD7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1208 310 312 311 312 311 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	250% Outstanding	Read 2,210 Write 1,589 Mixed 1,335 SusWrite 461 311% 1,399 MB/s	4K Read 61.7 4K Write 180 4K Mixed 86.4 300% 109 MB/s	DQ Read 967 DQ Write 856 DQ Mixed 940 697% 921 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 250% Great: 249%
Reeinno MC20 240GB S6N8 387 User benchmarks, average bench 145% 217GB free Firmware: 1.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1127 1153 398 95 113 113 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	190% Outstanding	Read 1,711 Write 1,117 Mixed 1,020 SusWrite 500 242% 1087 MB/s	4K Read 45.3 4K Write 156 4K Mixed 44.6 208% 81.8 MB/s	DQ Read 434 DQ Write 855 DQ Mixed 70.5 217% 453 MB/s
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 190% Great: 196%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 139 143 142 141 143 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	67% Good	Read 93 Write 122 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 139 67% 93.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 0.4 172% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB 38,955 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.9% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 12.8 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 15 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 57 70% 57 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	50	31.5"	1280 720	MEIC329 Panasonic-TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME Z270M-PLUS/BR Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 75%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270M-PLUS/BR

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	37x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	11x
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	12x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	8x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
SSDNow KC300 240GBKingston $81Bench 78%, 2,054 samples	4x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	6x
HyperX 2666 C16 2x16GBKingstonBench 84%, 17,710 samples	4x
16GBFFFFBench 65%, 18 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $680

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16