Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 116% UFO	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 111% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	144% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201022
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '21 at 00:46
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT-$359 30,318 User benchmarks, average bench 85% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Memory 73 1-Core 140 2-Core 282 88% 165 Pts	4-Core 481 8-Core 811 79% 646 Pts	64-Core 1,047 65% 1,047 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Asus(1043 87C1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	144% Outstanding	Lighting 211 Reflection 196 Parallax 188 172% 198 fps	MRender 188 Gravity 144 Splatting 129 123% 154 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 144% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: 580ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 76 74 85 86 86 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 247 Write 119 Mixed 176 SusWrite 79.5 34% 155 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 91.6 4K Mixed 32.3 130% 50.2 MB/s	DQ Read 85.9 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 89.6 71% 98.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 73%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 118 117 118 118 119 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Read 148 Write 174 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 117 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1 218% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x8GB 7,973 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	69.2% Good	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 25.4 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 21.6 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 27.7 63% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 94.7 42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	120	26.9"	1280 720	HKC0000

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $159Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	2,616x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $201Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,226x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $85Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	853x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	819x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	699x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	621x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $79Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	311x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	301x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	276x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	372x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	222x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	203x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $678

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16