Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics90.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170908
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 01 '21 at 06:08
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 63.7
1-Core 93
2-Core 172
62% 109 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 486
49% 399 Pts
64-Core 803
50% 803 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$270
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.7% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 104
Parallax 110
96% 110 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 94.1
Splatting 81.9
80% 101 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 106 137 140 131 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 386
Write 366
Mixed 331
SusWrite 148
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 34.9
115% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 360
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 124%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
110GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 37 37 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.3% Very poor
Read 38.9
Write 37.3
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 37.4
9% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 10
33% 9.93 MB/s
DQ Read 30
DQ Write 26.8
DQ Mixed 28.2
21% 28.3 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.4% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 24
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 15.7
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 41: 5R 4G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
41% 14% 96 288 217 60 27" 1920 1080 SPT0CB3 C32
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $322
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback