Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IU_FA706IU

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IU_FA706IU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FA706IU
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210129
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 01 '21 at 15:45
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 20,504 User benchmarks, average bench 74% FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 76.9 1-Core 75.6 2-Core 147 60% 99.9 Pts	4-Core 397 8-Core 569 60% 483 Pts	64-Core 758 47% 758 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU) 162,082 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Asus(1043 16FF) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.20.02 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	7.68% Terrible	Lighting 7 Reflection 54.7 Parallax 10.5 6% 24.1 fps	MRender 14 Gravity 12.1 Splatting 15.5 12% 13.9 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.68% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB 10,140 User benchmarks, average bench 134% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: 21106000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 275 219 219 217 220 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	160% Outstanding	Read 1,438 Write 911 Mixed 957 SusWrite 246 197% 888 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 129 4K Mixed 64.7 188% 72.6 MB/s	DQ Read 679 DQ Write 539 DQ Mixed 572 438% 597 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 189%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 930GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 127 128 128 127 113 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Read 107 Write 110 Mixed 68 SusWrite 124 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 200% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GB 42,443 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 42.9 MC Write 41.8 MC Mixed 35.9 115% 40.2 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 31.6 SC Mixed 21.4 70% 24.4 GB/s	Latency 86.4 46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 11: 1R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
11%	10%	51	259	144	120	17.3"	1536 864	AUO479D

History: Score 4: 0R 1G 1B | Score 11: 1R 1G 3B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IU_FA706IU Builds (Compare 235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IU_FA706IU

CPU
Ryzen 7 4800HAMDBench 74%, 20,504 samples	174x
Ryzen 9 4900HAMDBench 74%, 1,531 samples	34x
Ryzen 5 4600HAMDBench 70%, 27,218 samples	26x

GPU
RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)AMDBench 13%, 162,082 samples	133x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	102x

SSD
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	83x
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	53x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	29x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	45x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GBMicronBench 70%, 20,634 samples	31x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16