Gigabyte GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 179%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics171% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive319% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF  (all builds)
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '21 at 23:40
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$250
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 90.5
1-Core 166
2-Core 328
105% 195 Pts
4-Core 642
8-Core 1,242
112% 942 Pts
64-Core 2,302
142% 2,302 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.7.2
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
171% Outstanding
Lighting 216
Reflection 246
Parallax 427
176% 296 fps
MRender 368
Gravity 155
Splatting 266
214% 263 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 171%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
251GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1748 1743 1714 1684 1687 1651 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 2289
Write 1,855
Mixed 885
SusWrite 1,704
376% 1,683 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 67.9
241% 88.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,190
DQ Write 1,023
DQ Mixed 1,022
789% 1,078 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 319%
Great: 353%
WD Blue 3D 1TB-$85
413GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 489 489 490 490 490 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 482
Mixed 390
SusWrite 489
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 49.3
172% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 279
230% 329 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 119%
Great: 121%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
115GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 56 68 57 59 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 1,352
Write 408
Mixed 755
SusWrite 121
144% 659 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 42.2
142% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 47.3
DQ Mixed 71.8
61% 91.4 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 110%
Great: 209%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$139
603GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 490 490 490 491 490 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 474
Mixed 420
SusWrite 490
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 58.9
196% 68.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 371
279% 372 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE16G4D32AEEA.K16FB 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 62
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 40.5
136% 47.5 GB/s
SC Read 31
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 41
92% 32 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 127%
Great: 181%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 66: 8R 7G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
66% 53% 38 330 265 144 48.9" 3840 1080 SAM0E5E C49HG9x
Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $1,065
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback