HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3396
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120507
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '21 at 01:35
Run Duration	249 Seconds
Run User	EUR-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 102 2-Core 186 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 460 48% 384 Pts	64-Core 489 30% 489 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	19.3% Very poor	Lighting 25.1 Reflection 24.2 Parallax 25.3 20% 24.9 fps	MRender 23.3 Gravity 26.6 Splatting 14.8 17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 643GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 12 22 20 21 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	30.2% Below average	Read 86.5 Write 31.3 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 18.8 30% 40.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 23% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB 6,833 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 13 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 39.7 Write 40.5 Mixed 36.9 SusWrite 13.6 24% 32.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.7 235% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 89%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB 223 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1TB free, PID ce17 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 12 13 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 40.2 Write 36.9 Mixed 35.3 SusWrite 12.6 41% 31.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 89% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 21%
BUFFALO External HDD 3TB 370 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2TB free, PID 0257 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 11 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 36.5 Write 34.2 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 10.4 35% 27.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 0443 RMR5030ME68F9F1600 M378B5173QH0-CK0 0443 RMR5030ME68F9F1600 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.6% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 15.7 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 10.9 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 5: 0R 0G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
5%	5%	96	210	117	60	23.5"	1536 864	GSM59D6 24EN33

History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 5: 0R 0G 5B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,041x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	965x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	400x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	380x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	336x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	209x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	120x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	66x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	42x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	48x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	27x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16