MSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B58
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58)  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190826
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateAug 02 '21 at 15:41
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 136
2-Core 273
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 870
83% 685 Pts
64-Core 1,111
69% 1,111 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 137
Parallax 129
103% 131 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 135
Splatting 118
100% 123 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,962
Write 1,245
Mixed 460
267% 1,222 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 49.6
198% 76.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,056
DQ Write 990
DQ Mixed 886
703% 977 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Blue SATA M.2 250GB-$89
205GB free
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 199 195 193 195 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 472
Mixed 231
SusWrite 203
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 52
172% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 238
195% 280 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 100%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
300GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 473 475 481 480 474 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 484
Mixed 405
SusWrite 476
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 61.4
209% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 358
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 130%
Great: 134%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
441GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 116 115 116 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 147
Write 136
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 115
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 86%
WD My Book Essentials 1TB
550GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 40 40 40 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 35.1
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 39.2
47% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
96% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 28.7
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 42.2
SC Mixed 30.1
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 96%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 57: 6R 6G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
57% 40% 52 308 229 144 24" 1920 1080 BNQ7F31 ZOWIE XL LCD
History: Score 20: 3R 0G 5B | Score 57: 6R 6G 9B
Typical Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58) Builds (Compare 2,174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,006
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback