Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DAP_M515DA

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DAP_M515DA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X515DAP
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 07 '21 at 10:41
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	94%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics 10,258 User benchmarks, average bench 38% FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	32.5% Below average	Memory 30.4 1-Core 63.5 2-Core 89.7 35% 61.2 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 223 27% 209 Pts	64-Core 29.2 2% 29.2 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics 17,211 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 1FCF) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.44.05 Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	2.04% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 3.4 Parallax 2.9 2% 2.8 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 4.2 3% 3.13 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.04% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB 10,140 User benchmarks, average bench 134% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: 21106000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 160 164 162 167 163 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Read 464 Write 173 Mixed 172 SusWrite 162 53% 243 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 41.2 4K Mixed 24 77% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 419 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 222 190% 285 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 189%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 931GB free Firmware: JU0C2J SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 132 133 133 138 115 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	72.4% Very good	Read 122 Write 121 Mixed 57.1 SusWrite 129 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 0.5 211% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GB 2,461 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3200, 3200 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.5% Average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 25 MC Mixed 18.5 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 8.8 22% 7.87 GB/s	Latency 252 16% 252 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	4	2	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMN15E6

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DAP_M515DA Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DAP_M515DA

CPU
Ryzen 3 3250U GraphicsAMDBench 38%, 10,258 samples	184x
Athlon Silver 3050U GraphicsAMDBench 35%, 5,719 samples	7x
Athlon Gold 3150U GraphicsAMDBench 45%, 2,359 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 17,211 samples	177x
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 27,821 samples	19x

SSD
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	117x
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA256TCK 256GBBench 161%, 2,141 samples	29x
OM8PCP3512F-AB1 512GBKingstonBench 128%, 190 samples	16x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GBMicronBench 67%, 2,461 samples	48x
4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GBMicronBench 71%, 1,143 samples	24x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16