MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory32.9 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '21 at 21:36
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 74.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 214
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 791
72% 607 Pts
64-Core 1,384
86% 1,384 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
MSI(1462 381E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 21.7.2
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.1% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 116
Parallax 152
85% 124 fps
MRender 88.8
Gravity 106
Splatting 77.3
73% 90.8 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101200RL Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 774 796 822 851 754 751 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,588
Write 1,703
Mixed 606
SusWrite 791
262% 1,172 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 42.6
130% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 244
202% 288 MB/s
Poor: 172%
This bench: 167%
Great: 292%
Ct2000bx 50 2TB
320GB free
Firmware: M6CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 391 357 317 310 310 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 317
Write 340
Mixed 108
SusWrite 343
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 24.2
98% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 40.2
72% 141 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72%
Great: 93%
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
356GB free
Firmware: 0301
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 41 42 41 41 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.6% Very poor
Read 20.7
Write 19.5
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 40.7
7% 30 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 12
44% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 16.7
DQ Write 18.8
DQ Mixed 17.1
13% 17.5 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 133 137 136 139 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 76.9
Write 73.9
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 135
62% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.5
176% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/16GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/16GX 40GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
70.2% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 28.6
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 25.4
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 28.8" 1280 720 GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $910
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback