Asrock X300M-STX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X300M-STX  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200804
Uptime23 Days
Run DateAug 13 '21 at 19:33
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User SLV-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$101
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 67.8
1-Core 100
2-Core 165
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 434
47% 372 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.2.3
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 17
Parallax 31.5
18% 23.4 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 26.3
Splatting 15.9
14% 17.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1514 1614 1622 1878 1292 504 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1,943
Write 1,774
Mixed 1,514
SusWrite 1404
373% 1,658 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 59.7
206% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 932
DQ Write 583
DQ Mixed 772
572% 762 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 261%
Great: 435%
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1001 1TB
861GB free
Firmware: 11160101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 542 585 449 636 654 635 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 666
Write 605
Mixed 644
SusWrite 584
141% 624 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 51.2
176% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 826
DQ Write 698
DQ Mixed 846
611% 790 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 150%
Great: 332%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
864GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 451 452 438 429 413 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 430
Mixed 420
SusWrite 439
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 49.2
155% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 259
190% 248 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 104%
Great: 133%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
347GB free
Firmware: LDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 67 69 69 70 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 48.8
Write 67.6
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 65.3
40% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.1
57% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7EH99AA# 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 29.2
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 19.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 1R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 26% 35 133 40 60 34.8" 1920 1080 XXX0000 WXGA TV
Typical X300M-STX Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock X300M-STX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $181
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback