Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 84% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	84.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190715
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '21 at 21:25
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$290 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	99.9% Outstanding	Memory 92 1-Core 144 2-Core 289 96% 175 Pts	4-Core 577 8-Core 1139 101% 858 Pts	64-Core 1,141 71% 1,141 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Gigabyte(1458 3FDA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	84.9% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 97.9 Parallax 107 87% 104 fps	MRender 154 Gravity 59 Splatting 87.5 80% 100 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP S700 500GB-$60 12,813 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0704A1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 406 414 419 420 71 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 417 Mixed 419 SusWrite 328 94% 417 MB/s	4K Read 42.3 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 35.7 170% 64 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 54.4 98% 189 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 688GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 171 171 170 168 168 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 196 Write 180 Mixed 99.2 SusWrite 167 118% 160 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 237% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMWX8GD3000C16W4D 2x8GB 1,266 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	MC Read 32.4 MC Write 29.9 MC Mixed 23.4 82% 28.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.1 SC Write 31 SC Mixed 19.5 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 64.1 62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	10	8	30	36.1"	1280 720	TCL0000 55S535CA

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700FIntel $290Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	1,611x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,214x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	177x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	828x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	480x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	428x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	295x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	217x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples	142x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	360x
D12.2356WS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 81%, 464 samples	171x
D12.2324CS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 80%, 469 samples	161x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $433

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16