PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z440 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 212B |
Memory | 4.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161214 |
Uptime | 2.2 Days |
Run Date | Aug 18 '21 at 20:22 |
Run Duration | 224 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 56% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
67.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56.1%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ73H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 838 557 468 416 393 379 MB/s
|
127%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
62GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 309 295 297 305 311 MB/s
|
81%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A1G40EB1-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
59.8%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
43% | 15% | 62 | 288 | 218 | 165 | 27" | 1920 1080 | AUS2720 VG278 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 1,227x |
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 1,026x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 854x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 735x |
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 373x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 222x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 9% - Terrible | Total price: $440 |