Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics87% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive24.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181130
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateAug 19 '21 at 13:50
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Memory 68
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 168
61% 107 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 223
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Nvidia(10DE 1F08) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 156
Parallax 105
88% 123 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 99
Splatting 91.8
86% 108 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 36 37 61 21 45 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.4% Poor
Read 155
Write 104
Mixed 90.4
SusWrite 36.9
21% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 11
51% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 14.2
DQ Write 15.3
DQ Mixed 14.5
11% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 91%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
222GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 247 82 82 82 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 456
Mixed 402
SusWrite 155
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 43.7
148% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.C16FE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
51.9% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 17.2
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 23.8" 1280 720 ACR071D Acer R240Y
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $322
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback