Today's hottest deals

Positivo N250WU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemPositivo N250WU  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo N250WU-V
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180312
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 19 '21 at 20:53
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 48%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 74.6
1-Core 77.7
2-Core 134
58% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 276
30% 239 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Clevo(1558 2410) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.11% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 6.2
5% 5.3 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 5
Splatting 9.7
6% 6.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.11%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-CB256 256GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GC8010A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 171 230 177 212 181 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 431
Write 342
Mixed 286
SusWrite 197
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 25.1
74% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 120
141% 243 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE800SO102408-2400 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.4% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 9.6
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 10.3
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 21: 3R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 41% 17 42 13 60 15.5" 1536 864 LGD0533
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback