Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369

Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA560
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210104
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '21 at 03:11
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	92% Outstanding	Memory 92.9 1-Core 141 2-Core 283 95% 172 Pts	4-Core 490 8-Core 784 78% 637 Pts	64-Core 930 58% 930 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop) 45,297 User benchmarks, average bench 114% Device(1A58 2012) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	111% Outstanding	Lighting 146 Reflection 157 Parallax 137 119% 147 fps	MRender 160 Gravity 114 Splatting 109 102% 127 fps
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 127%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GB 4,252 User benchmarks, average bench 231% 381GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXF7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1730 1071 794 795 794 797 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	264% Outstanding	Read 2026 Write 1,992 Mixed 1,442 SusWrite 997 362% 1,614 MB/s	4K Read 57.3 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 73 240% 80.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,175 DQ Write 952 DQ Mixed 1070 799% 1,066 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑ This bench: 264% Great: 297%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 1TB 4,980 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 135GB free Firmware: 1012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 157 159 164 170 164 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	53% Above average	Read 305 Write 263 Mixed 145 SusWrite 162 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 25.5 83% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 108 82% 111 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GB 1,277 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	86.1% Excellent	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 34.3 MC Mixed 24 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 19.1 SC Write 38.9 SC Mixed 26.1 80% 28 GB/s	Latency 62.3 64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 31: 3R 2G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
31%	13%	113	304	222	144	15.5"	1536 864	BOE0804

History: Score 33: 3R 4G 6B | Score 31: 3R 2G 10B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369 Builds (Compare 731 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	731x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	270x
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	245x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	207x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	271x
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	183x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	409x
NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 1,277 samples	160x
TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 2x16GBUnknownBench 76%, 2,477 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16