Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509FA
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190828
Uptime	3.7 Days
Run Date	Aug 22 '21 at 15:42
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	4%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8265U 87,841 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Memory 62.7 1-Core 38 2-Core 67.3 37% 56 Pts	4-Core 137 8-Core 211 22% 174 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1961) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	2.92% Terrible	Lighting 2.9 Reflection 3.2 Parallax 3.4 2% 3.17 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 2.9 Splatting 6.5 4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.92% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON RBUSNS8 256GB 4,910 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11.T Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 516 238 255 255 227 218 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	69% Good	Read 525 Write 578 Mixed 547 SusWrite 285 109% 484 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 15.4 59% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 314 DQ Write 259 DQ Mixed 293 218% 289 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 130%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GB 2,923 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2400, 2667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	49.3% Average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 18.6 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 10.8 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 6: 1R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
6%	29%	7	17	4	60	15.5"	1536 864	AUO61ED

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA Builds (Compare 244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	109x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	94x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	37x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	240x
UHD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 3,878 samples	4x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	35x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GBWDCBench 155%, 2,132 samples	32x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	15x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 57%, 2,923 samples	44x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 1x4GBMicronBench 33%, 1,799 samples	37x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16