Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201022
Uptime3 Days
Run DateAug 25 '21 at 04:50
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$515
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 81.9
1-Core 156
2-Core 310
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 601
8-Core 1,169
105% 885 Pts
64-Core 2,877
178% 2,877 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Nvidia(10DE 1B82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 131
Parallax 133
99% 128 fps
MRender 94.8
Gravity 125
Splatting 111
91% 110 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-00000 256GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXH7201Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,390
Write 2,204
Mixed 1,522
453% 2,038 MB/s
4K Read 64.7
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 86.6
288% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,008
DQ Write 1,128
DQ Mixed 1,164
850% 1,100 MB/s
Poor: 132% Great: 261%
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
113GB free
Firmware: X231600
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 279 292 292 293 275 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 280
Mixed 216
SusWrite 272
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 35.8
142% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 123
127% 211 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 89%
Jmicron Tech 120GB
76GB free
Firmware: 0509
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 118 122 121 122 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
44% Average
Read 341
Write 136
Mixed 180
SusWrite 121
43% 195 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 16.9
65% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 99.4
DQ Write 40.2
DQ Mixed 52.9
44% 64.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 44%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
124GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 63 63 64 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 61.6
Write 64.2
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 63.1
44% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 62%
WD WD7500AVVS-63E1B1 750GB
271GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 76 76 78 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 61.6
Write 57.2
Mixed 39.6
SusWrite 75.8
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 55%
Jmicron Tech 500GB
46GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 61 105 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 110
Write 102
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 84.1
64% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 44.5
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 41.1
120% 42.1 GB/s
SC Read 27.3
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 38.1
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 113%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 27" 1280 720 OOO0001 CF2776K
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $645
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback