Asrock 760GM-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock 760GM-HDV (all builds)
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180424
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 26 '21 at 17:50
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8370-$175 34,720 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Memory 74.5 1-Core 59.4 2-Core 114 51% 82.7 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 262 30% 235 Pts	64-Core 269 17% 269 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 22DD) CLim: 1212 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.8.2 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Lighting 22.2 Reflection 27 Parallax 32.2 18% 27.1 fps	MRender 27.7 Gravity 24.9 Splatting 25.5 21% 26 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 65 76 27 74 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.2% Very poor	Read 123 Write 75.5 Mixed 64.1 SusWrite 63.7 18% 81.6 MB/s	4K Read 9.5 4K Write 14.2 4K Mixed 8.2 32% 10.6 MB/s	DQ Read 7.4 DQ Write 15.8 DQ Mixed 11.4 9% 11.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 634GB free Firmware: MS2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 164 165 164 165 164 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	98.1% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 177 Mixed 39.2 SusWrite 161 101% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE8G3D21BCE1.16FN 1x8GB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM 200 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	23.3% Poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 7.7 21% 7.47 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 7.2 19% 6.8 GB/s	Latency 91.5 44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 53: 7R 5G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
53%	52%	29	77	4	75	27"	1920 1080	ACR06FA QG271

History: Score 39: 4R 4G 7B | Score 53: 7R 5G 3B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 760GM-HDV Builds (Compare 306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 760GM-HDV

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	120x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	63x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	46x

GPU
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	37x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	32x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	22x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 82%, 2,092 samples	8x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	48x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GBUnknownBench 27%, 3,584 samples	15x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16