Asus G11CD-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (89%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G11CD-K  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G11CD-K
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '21 at 19:24
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 89%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 77.1
1-Core 72.6
2-Core 167
61% 105 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 271
30% 237 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 203B) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23% Poor
Lighting 28.5
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 25.6
23% 28.3 fps
MRender 32.9
Gravity 30.9
Splatting 21.8
23% 28.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 1TB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 348 242 171 178 316 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 385
Write 187
Mixed 239
SusWrite 244
196% 264 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 30.8
5,796% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 202
2,092% 256 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 104%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
118GB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 92 96 88 95 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 35.1
Write 119
Mixed 31
SusWrite 91.7
50% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
72% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 108%
Essentiel B 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 60A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 27 36 18 13 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 28.1
Write 25.2
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 19.8
14% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
29% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 78%
TOSHIBA MQ04ABF100 1TB
869GB free, PID 0429
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 32 30 31 30 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.78% Terrible
Read 9.4
Write 10.5
Mixed 11
SusWrite 29.7
22% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
14% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.78%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G26C16U4W.16FD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
70.2% Very good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 24.3
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 19.8
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G11CD-K Builds (Compare 1,736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus G11CD-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $196
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback