Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X571GT
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201217
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 30 '21 at 09:53
Run Duration	260 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	24% Poor	Memory 34.5 1-Core 24.8 2-Core 41.5 22% 33.6 Pts	4-Core 73.2 8-Core 135 12% 104 Pts	64-Core 160 10% 160 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1A81) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.98% Terrible	Lighting 6.4 Reflection 4.9 Parallax 0.5 5% 3.93 fps	MRender 5.7 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 0.5 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.98% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB 26,870 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80001C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 100 94 90 90 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 677 Write 155 Mixed 323 SusWrite 96.1 68% 313 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 52.3 4K Mixed 34 97% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 436 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 219 184% 274 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 153%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 930GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 142 138 145 145 142 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	78.4% Very good	Read 130 Write 126 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 142 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.6 218% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB 928 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2400, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	37% Below average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 15.2 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 7.1 20% 7.03 GB/s	Latency 230 17% 230 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 10: 1R 0G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
10%	13%	45	16	6	60	15.5"	1536 864	CMN1520

History: Score 3: 0R 1G 0B | Score 10: 1R 0G 5B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT Builds (Compare 619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT

CPU
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	240x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	200x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	146x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	398x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	221x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	366x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	86x
SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBIntelBench 185%, 19,397 samples	50x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	182x
HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBHynixBench 64%, 485 samples	81x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 16GBHynixBench 76%, 1,437 samples	69x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16