Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory	19.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 03 '21 at 06:34
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 57,853 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Memory 27.1 1-Core 68.4 2-Core 127 39% 74.3 Pts	4-Core 227 8-Core 380 37% 304 Pts	64-Core 380 24% 380 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.3% Poor	Lighting 38 Reflection 29.6 Parallax 21 31% 29.5 fps	MRender 8 Gravity 35.4 Splatting 36.3 23% 26.6 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 36 58 68 54 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 1,186 Write 602 Mixed 767 SusWrite 118 148% 668 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 65.3 4K Mixed 44.8 146% 48.7 MB/s	DQ Read 330 DQ Write 84.5 DQ Mixed 83.7 94% 166 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 209%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 105GB free Firmware: SBFK61K1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 54 78 65 66 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 394 Write 270 Mixed 286 SusWrite 96.7 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 49.6 4K Mixed 19.8 81% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 195 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 137 117% 171 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK CT16G4SFRA266.M16FRS 24GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	24% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 9.8 24% 8.33 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 10.3 24% 8.57 GB/s	Latency 272 15% 272 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	120	15.5"	1280 720	NCP0036

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	1,835x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	978x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,359x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	946x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	507x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	1,156x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	404x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	380x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	587x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	376x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	135x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16