Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X571GT
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201217
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '21 at 17:11
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 79 1-Core 88.3 2-Core 178 66% 115 Pts	4-Core 269 8-Core 399 42% 334 Pts	64-Core 518 32% 518 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 1A81) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6259 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.4% Average	Lighting 54.9 Reflection 84 Parallax 49.5 45% 62.8 fps	MRender 42.3 Gravity 48.7 Splatting 46.8 38% 45.9 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 46%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 121 55 41 12 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 983 Write 690 Mixed 746 SusWrite 95.9 140% 628 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 78.7 4K Mixed 41.9 148% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 335 DQ Write 541 DQ Mixed 220 228% 365 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 209%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB 202 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	40.2% Average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 13 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 13 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 82.3 49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	120	24.5"	1280 720	ACR0753 KG251Q

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT Builds (Compare 619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT

CPU
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	240x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	200x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	146x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	398x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	221x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	366x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	86x
SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBIntelBench 185%, 19,397 samples	50x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	182x
HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBHynixBench 64%, 485 samples	81x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 16GBHynixBench 76%, 1,437 samples	69x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16