PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H67 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120302 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 05 '21 at 15:38 |
Run Duration | 232 Seconds |
Run User | BOL-User |
Background CPU | 24% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
71.2%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.27
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.5%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung PM830 128GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 103 93 77 92 103 MB/s
|
33.7%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung HD251HJ 250GB-$39
37GB free
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 79 82 79 79 MB/s
|
41.6%
Average
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
464GB free, PID a208
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 29 29 29 29 MB/s
|
16.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT51264BA160B.C16F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29.5%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
33% | 22% | 60 | 283 | 225 | 75 | 23.9" | 1920 1080 | SAM707D LF24T35 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 165x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 115x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 104x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 67x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 52x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 40x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $431 |