Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 208% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 233% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	214% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210809
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '21 at 18:20
Run Duration	347 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	99% Outstanding	Memory 91.3 1-Core 154 2-Core 289 98% 178 Pts	4-Core 570 8-Core 1140 101% 855 Pts	64-Core 2,135 132% 2,135 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 99% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660 155,335 User benchmarks, average bench 204% Asus(1043 8802) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	214% Outstanding	Lighting 316 Reflection 299 Parallax 331 257% 315 fps	MRender 358 Gravity 256 Splatting 191 211% 268 fps
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 214% Great: 225%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$31 9,202 User benchmarks, average bench 183% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1025 950 902 826 880 824 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	243% Outstanding	Read 1,865 Write 1,188 Mixed 749 SusWrite 901 261% 1,176 MB/s	4K Read 52.8 4K Write 168 4K Mixed 67 255% 96 MB/s	DQ Read 1,225 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 569 478% 719 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 243% Great: 243%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 485GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 462 463 463 463 463 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 455 Mixed 413 SusWrite 463 103% 458 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 96.8 4K Mixed 48.4 166% 60.1 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 220 166% 223 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 121%
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79 15,015 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 111GB free Firmware: DC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 120 137 128 118 136 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	78.3% Very good	Read 450 Write 137 Mixed 190 SusWrite 124 50% 225 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 84.7 4K Mixed 38.3 147% 52.8 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 119 103% 153 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 79%
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB 44,185 User benchmarks, average bench 430% 314GB free Firmware: 613200WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 4792 3600 1292 981 997 993 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	456% Outstanding	Read 3,278 Write 4,717 Mixed 3,316 SusWrite 2,109 758% 3,355 MB/s	4K Read 85.8 4K Write 276 4K Mixed 115 423% 159 MB/s	DQ Read 1,935 DQ Write 1,064 DQ Mixed 1,519 1,124% 1,506 MB/s
Poor: 264% ↑ This bench: 456% Great: 573%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 474GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 130 136 137 136 135 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Read 173 Write 149 Mixed 85.7 SusWrite 133 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 112%
Samsung HE502IJ 500GB 306 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 38GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 90 91 91 90 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 86.8 Write 43.5 Mixed 59.8 SusWrite 90 52% 70 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB 44,547 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	MC Read 49.3 MC Write 45.7 MC Mixed 38.5 127% 44.5 GB/s	SC Read 27.8 SC Write 26.9 SC Mixed 37.8 88% 30.8 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 28: 4R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
28%	50%	20	110	8	144	27"	2560 1440	ACR0408 XB270HU

History: Score 19: 2R 3G 0B | Score 28: 4R 1G 5B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,305x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $152Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	869x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	833x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	570x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	515x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	403x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	339x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	271x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $940

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16