MSI MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 222%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics211% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C80
MotherboardMSI MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201010
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '21 at 23:06
Run Duration383 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$236
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 162
2-Core 322
105% 193 Pts
4-Core 644
8-Core 1,215
111% 930 Pts
64-Core 1749
108% 1749 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 108%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
211% Outstanding
Lighting 307
Reflection 292
Parallax 360
250% 320 fps
MRender 362
Gravity 265
Splatting 196
215% 274 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 211%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,478
Write 706
Mixed 1,288
325% 1,491 MB/s
4K Read 62.5
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 84.9
287% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 981
DQ Write 951
DQ Mixed 1,011
747% 981 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
228GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1368 1118 1084 1041 1002 956 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
308% Outstanding
Read 2528
Write 2,398
Mixed 1,710
SusWrite 1,095
433% 1,933 MB/s
4K Read 62
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 86.4
285% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,285
DQ Write 1033
DQ Mixed 1,165
870% 1,161 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 308%
Great: 372%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
191GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 269 278 278 279 279 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 304
Mixed 345
SusWrite 274
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 53.5
187% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 231
208% 315 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 111%
Great: 118%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
278GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1825 1584 1471 1365 1307 1306 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 2,653
Write 2,455
Mixed 1967
SusWrite 1,476
479% 2,138 MB/s
4K Read 63.3
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 86.4
283% 97.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,313
DQ Write 1,080
DQ Mixed 1,191
893% 1,195 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 338%
Great: 410%
Seagate NAS HDD 3TB-$119
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 176 177 172 168 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 161
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 170
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 28.5
96% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 30.1
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 56.8
70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 75: 10R 6G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
75% 70% 33 348 287 144 27" 1920 1080 GSM5B71 27GL650F
History: Score 64: 9R 4G 7B | Score 75: 10R 6G 7B
Typical MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C80) Builds (Compare 8,489 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK - $223

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $999
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback