Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505GT
Memory	2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201126
Uptime	5.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '21 at 23:59
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 23,588 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 80 1-Core 114 2-Core 218 77% 137 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 576 59% 478 Pts	64-Core 582 36% 582 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1AB1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	2.75% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 64.2 Parallax 3.2 2% 23.4 fps	MRender 4.3 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 6.3 4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.75% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDBRPG5000ANC-WRSN 500GB 18,375 User benchmarks, average bench 251% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: 111110WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 702 577 555 515 522 507 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	174% Outstanding	Read 1273 Write 1,691 Mixed 1,627 SusWrite 563 291% 1,288 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 56 187% 66.3 MB/s	DQ Read 774 DQ Write 612 DQ Mixed 691 518% 692 MB/s
Poor: 182% ↑ This bench: 174% Great: 296%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 884GB free Firmware: SDM4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 119 124 113 100 120 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 89 Write 97.4 Mixed 65.4 SusWrite 114 67% 91.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.7 190% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GB 28,935 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.4% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 11.7 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 13.6 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 80.6 50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 33: 2R 6G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
33%	30%	44	104	5	60	15.5"	1536 864	NCP002D

History: Score 15: 1R 1G 7B | Score 33: 2R 6G 5B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT Builds (Compare 2,145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

CPU
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 68%, 23,588 samples	992x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	800x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	353x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,090x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,055x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	761x
Micron_2200V_MTF 512GBNvmeBench 152%, 896 samples	333x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	214x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	563x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	306x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	107x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16