Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210713
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 07 '21 at 20:27
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 79.2 1-Core 102 2-Core 218 74% 133 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 430 57% 429 Pts	64-Core 429 27% 429 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.5% Above average	Lighting 64.3 Reflection 67.1 Parallax 62.1 52% 64.5 fps	MRender 64.9 Gravity 66.8 Splatting 62.5 53% 64.7 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR041 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 70 77 67 69 89 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	54% Above average	Read 482 Write 426 Mixed 42.1 SusWrite 83.8 57% 258 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 24.4 4K Mixed 15.2 66% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 0.2 64% 149 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 92%
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GB 3,461 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 171GB free Firmware: SBFMP1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 317 132 230 132 138 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 334 Write 103 Mixed 91.8 SusWrite 218 41% 187 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 24.7 4K Mixed 14.9 60% 19.4 MB/s	DQ Read 23.7 DQ Write 26.5 DQ Mixed 24.2 18% 24.8 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 1x16GB 2,327 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 18.9 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 16.9 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 82 49% 82 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 54: 6R 5G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
54%	18%	109	323	255	60	24.5"	1920 1080	IVM6135 PL2592H

History: Score 44: 5R 4G 7B | Score 54: 6R 5G 9B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,461x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,304x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,006x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	949x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	734x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	653x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	716x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	339x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	284x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	293x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	226x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $322

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16