Colorful DJ H310M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Colorful DJ H310M-E (all builds)
Motherboard	Colorful DJ H310M-E
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190411
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '21 at 06:18
Run Duration	403 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Memory 43.6 1-Core 25.7 2-Core 47.8 26% 39 Pts	4-Core 92.8 8-Core 98.7 13% 95.8 Pts	64-Core 84.8 5% 84.8 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 5,763 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Device(7377 0000) 3GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Lighting 41.2 Reflection 34 Parallax 37 34% 37.4 fps	MRender 27.1 Gravity 39.8 Splatting 26 25% 31 fps
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 30%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Colorful SL300 120GB 1,356 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0724S SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 51 55 58 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 345 Write 56.8 Mixed 83.7 SusWrite 54.6 29% 135 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 25.6 4K Mixed 9.8 48% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 97.6 DQ Write 51.1 DQ Mixed 18 28% 55.6 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 439GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 97 140 134 88 138 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Read 183 Write 149 Mixed 97.3 SusWrite 112 100% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 180% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CDPC08G2666D4N 1x8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 13.1 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 9 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 186 22% 186 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 47: 5R 5G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
47%	17%	99	223	134	60	21.5"	1920 1080	AOC2280 2280W

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical DJ H310M-E Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Colorful DJ H310M-E

CPU
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	17x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	16x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	5x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	4x

SSD
SL500 1TB DDRColorfulBench 109%, 87 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
SL500 240GBColorfulBench 69%, 1,190 samples	2x

RAM
CDPC16G2666D4N 1x16GBUnknownBench 45%, 29 samples	5x
BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 2x8GBCrucialBench 82%, 12,603 samples	2x
CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 78%, 40,300 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 113% - Outstanding

Total price: $147

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16