HP Compaq Pro 4300 SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq Pro 4300 SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2ADE
Memory	0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130904
Uptime	7 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '21 at 11:32
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Memory 91 1-Core 97.8 2-Core 192 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 362 50% 368 Pts	64-Core 371 23% 371 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 8621) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Lighting 18.1 Reflection 18.2 Parallax 18.5 15% 18.3 fps	MRender 15.7 Gravity 18.7 Splatting 16.6 14% 17 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 64GB 411 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 000F Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 244 Write 104 Mixed 136 35% 162 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 36.7 4K Mixed 12.9 63% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 26.7 DQ Mixed 25.4 33% 62.7 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 66%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 39GB free Firmware: 10.01E04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 8.8 13 14 20 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	9.8% Terrible	Read 17.8 Write 29 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 16.1 15% 20 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 61% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.8% Great: 33%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB 16,813 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 13GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8 5.1 4 7 6.7 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	6.35% Terrible	Read 16.3 Write 9.3 Mixed 7 SusWrite 6.6 12% 9.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 1.1 70% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.35% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905584-037.A00LF 1x4GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 7.9 24% 8.53 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 8.5 24% 8.37 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	48.5"	1280 701	SAM0A7A SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Pro 4300 SFF PC Builds (Compare 329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 4300 SFF PC

CPU
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	91x
Core i5-3470SIntelBench 65%, 14,631 samples	63x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	34x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	152x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	44x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	26x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	9x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	6x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 29%, 7,230 samples	10x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 28%, 7,085 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $107

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16